Chapter 29
I'll start off by saying I loved the letter sent in by Barb and John Boelter. I felt that it was very appropriate for them to defend themselves and other parents of deaf children as well. My favorite piece of the letter was when they spoke out regarding the comment previously made stating that " [it] is insulting to parents like us who have recognized from the beginning that our daughter needs the support and guidance of the Deaf community to grow and find her own identity. We have sought out and listened to the advice of deaf people in connection with every decision we have made." I have previously commented that this book continuously degrades hearing people and it gets quite obnoxious, therefore I was grateful for this response. I understand that not every parent of a deaf child is this concerned with the success of their child, however not all parents of hearing children are either! It is inevitable to avoid these types of relationships. I felt it was great to read of the steps this family is taking not only to ensure the best education for their daughter, but the best family setting as well.
Though it hasn't always been difficult to send your deaf child to a residential school, I think today it is much harder. Like the Boelter's said " ...parents today who do recognize the social, educational, and emotional needs of their deaf children should not be penalized for what parents did in the past." With struggles such as "difficulty attracting the best teachers, setting up the most stimulating curricula, and offering the highest-quality programs," it is no wonder parent's prefer to mainstream their children or send them to schools for the deaf which allow them to remain at home (such as Kentucky School for the Deaf). If you can not have full confidence in a residential school, why take the risk of stripping them out of a loving family environment?
Chapter 30
I had always just assumed I could visit my local or college library to gather information regarding deafness; or I could just surf the internet. However, I had never before heard of The Gallaudet Encylopedia of Deaf People and Deafness, Laurent Clerc National Deaf Education Center, the mail order catalog provided by Bison Bookstore at Gallaudet, or ANY other of the resources provided. I was excited to learn of these as I am sure they will be extremely helpful in the future.
I'm honestly not sure about any local agencies that support the deaf in my hometown. If there were any I feel as if I would be aware of them, but I do know that the deaf population in my small town is just that, small! I've never met one deaf individual in my town and where I come from everybody knows everybody.
Quiz
I guess I am just pretty good with true/false questions, because before taking this quiz I certainly didn't think I would do as well as I did on the last one. I felt that the information provided in this unit was more in depth compared to the last unit. Also, I didn't find it as interesting. I didn't hate reading the chapters, but I didn't enjoy it as much as the previous unit. However, I obviously retained information based on the performance of my quiz. It is a good feeling knowing that each time I pick up this book I do learn something new. I really appreciate the quizzes at the end of the units because it allows me to reflect and reminds me that I now have new information that I didn't previously have!
Sunday, November 25, 2012
Friday, November 23, 2012
Chapters 25-28
Chapter 25
This chapter mentions "the lucky ones whose parents are fluent in ASL and start school already knowing a language." Chapter 25 reminded me of a scenario I found myself in a few weeks ago when I went to job shadow a local teacher of the deaf. Immediately when I walked into the classroom, I was introduced to an amazing young man. He had a cochlear implant and could communicate fairly well, but was also very fluent in ASL. He was so outgoing, signing and jibber-jabbering away! It was absolutely astounding! A few moments later, we were joined by a, completely deaf, young girl. She timidly took her seat at the table and when the teacher started the lesson she appeared very confused and even with one on one attention couldn't grasp the content of the story they were reading. I wondered to myself how I could be in the middle of two children with similar conditions, however on extremely different levels of communication. After the kids returned to their classrooms, the teacher explained to me that the boy came from a very involved family who took all the steps necessary to make communication a possibility (as soon as they learned of his condition.) However, the girl wasn't so lucky. Her parents did not know ASL and never committed to learning the language. The only exposure she was consistently having was what she learned at school. No wonder she was having such a difficult time. I kept hearing Stacey refer to how she constantly encounters parents of deaf children who know very little to no sign language at all. No wonder so many children have language delays, parents are not educated enough nor motivated to put the effort into developing communication with their children. A solution to the literacy gap would be hard to accomplish, but I feel as if it should start in the home. Creating more programs for parents and raising awareness for the importance of ASL communication beginning as early as the English language would be an ideal start. Also by encouraging parents to take notice in the development of their children who weren't born deaf and not to ignore warning signs, earlier detection could aid in the process of breaching the literacy gap by enabling programs to be implemented as soon as possible. By putting ourselves in the shoes of a deaf child, with no previous language experience, walking into our first day of school, letting go of our parents hands we can all be inspired to help reach a common goal: communication for everyone.
Chapter 26
The reasons provided for why deaf people don't like to read were pretty obvious to me. One did stick out to me that I would like to touch on: "It was long considered more important for children to acquire good speech articulation than good reading and writing skills." Okay, I get that ASL has no traditional written form and that makes grasping literacy skills a bit more complicated. On the other hand, wouldn't speech development for a deaf person be on a whole new level of difficulty?!
Again, I'll reflect on the experience I had at the elementary school a few weeks ago. I shadowed a different girl first in her regular class with the deaf educator, then I followed her to her speech session. Huh? Didn't even know that completely deaf children saw speech pathologists. Anyways, when we went to speech the SLP explained to me a system for developing speech articulation in deaf children. It was extremely confusing and you could tell that the SLP wasn't very found of it. Basically, it was a chart of sounds with a picture by them resembling the mouth shape formed when you make the sound. This is how deaf children learned to make sounds and put them together. I was completely beside myself as the girl formed a few words. She was 100% deaf and I never even knew that this could happen. As awesome as it seemed to me, she was anything but happy. She struggled and you could just see the embarrassment on her face, she did not want to be talking. Getting to my point, I feel that it IS important for the deaf to grasp speech articulation, especially words like "stop" or anything that you might use on a daily basis. However, I do not feel that the value of speech articulation should be placed over the value of literacy. Reading and writing are things that you can have with you forever. It is not guaranteed that a deaf person will ever be able to speak, but being able to read and write could take the place of that! It is something that they can enjoy, communicate through, and even (not being stereotypical) escape through. It can be a replacement for hearing. By grasping the concepts of literacy they can learn so much and even experience comedy, romance, action, or even thrills.
The story on page 161 makes me sad. I assume this is point on to what deaf kids experience at some point throughout schooling. I do agree with the man, it would be great if actual deaf people TAUGHT! It's even more sad that the amount of deaf individuals who know enough English literacy to pass is on is very small. Imagine the impact actual deaf teachers would have on the development of deaf education! This is why we should be motivated to enhance the availability and quality of reading and writing training to the deaf, looking for innovative ways to make learning appealing, and recruiting more trained deaf educators. You have to start somewhere and only hope that it lights a spark.
Chapter 27
I'll be the first to admit it, I HATE, HATE, HATE subtitles!! They are so confusing and such a distraction. Whenever I watch a movie with subtitles, I focus more on them than I do the actual movie. The most annoying part of the subtitles is that they are usually so far behind the pace of the show, but if they were any fast they would be nearly impossible to catch. One time at church I saw live captioning as an ASL interpreter interpreted the songs and message. Even then, I focused more on the interpreter than the service. As a hearing person without knowledge or respect for the deaf community, I would be totally against interpreters on every TV channel. "How dare they cut out a block from the screen where I can't see?" BUT, now that I have a deep respect and love for this culture, I feel that it would only be fair to have interpreters on every channel. It would definitely be something to get used to, but we have this awesome ability called "sensory adaptation." This will enable us strange creatures to eventually, well get over it/used to it, and able to ignore a small section being taken up by an interpreter for the benefit of the deaf. Or how about this, let's create a deaf channel where TV series and movies are recorded with an interpreter or ASL styled subtitles?! Completely deaf friendly without murdering the views and ratings. As far as movies in theaters are concerned, alternatives like 3D are already offered, why not offer movies with interpreters on certain dates? This gives deaf people a great opportunity to participate in normal activities without discouraging "hearing movie go-ers."
Chapter 28
"is it possible to go back in time? No." This quote was incorporated into the final paragraph before discussing "The Charter School Option." Darn, that's discouraging. The beginning of this chapter painted a picturesque history of the earliest schools for the deaf. It states that the educators" taught, making themselves understandable to their students, using the simplest, most basic equipment, and their knowledge, experience, empathy, and drive." Wouldn't it be nice to get back to this way of schooling? Since this isn't exactly realistic, as we were so bluntly informed, I suppose that choosing the most suitable path of education for your own deaf child would be difficult.
If I were to have a deaf child, this is the plan of action I would most likely take: Putting my child's needs first and foremost, I would research the best options available near the area we were residing in. If in fact there happened to be an accredited/highly noted deaf school nearby (not residential) or charter school I would prefer for he or she to be enrolled there. Even if it were a commute or my family had to relocate I would feel that it would be necessary. This is due to my thoughts that children with issues such as being deaf should be around those most similar to them. In this case, they can grow up in an environment which enables them to make connections and established relationships. Also, deaf schools often have sports teams and extra curricular activities just like other schools do. By participating in these activities with other people who are similar it would be easier for my child to develop personal skills and be comfortable. Furthermore I feel that actual deaf schools offer the best option as far as educational success. Employees at deaf schools (I would hope) are there for the sole purpose of helping the deaf learn. Their career should extend beyond just a degree, they should have a passion for what they do. Lastly,the benefits of a charter school include parent involvement. By taking advantage of this education opportunity I, as a parent, would be surrounded by other parents who actually care about the progress of their child and don't just put the responsibility on the teachers alone. The opportunity for the highest level of education possible, comfort, and involvement for my child would specifically lead me to take the necessary steps to enroll them in a school for the deaf or charter school.
Chapters 22-24
Chapter 22
I know it is considered very impolite to stare, but it has always been extremely difficult not to stare when there are odd situations in public (well for me atleast). Growing up, and even today, it is easy for me to be enticed by ASL users in public. I often stare and wonder what in the world they are saying. It is kind of like at the nail salon- girls, you know what I'm talking about- the Asian ladies are constantly jibber jabbering in their (whatever) language and just full of laughter. It's hard for me to just ignore it besides they COULD be talking about me, right? But, my mom gets so frustrated and goes on and on about how I just "rudely eye-balled" them my entire appointment. Anyways, I am glad this chapter cleared some things up for me, such as "There is no such thing as a private ASL conversation in public." Now, I don't feel so bad. Also, now that I have some basic ASL instruction, it is good to know that it isn't necessarily bad manners to enter a conversation (at the appropriate time). I've always wanted to be apart of it instead of a simple onlooker staring in complete awe! This brings me to my next point... my biggest, and yes corny, wish! I want a name sign SO bad! I totally thought that this one deaf guy I met at a DCE a few weeks ago would give me one after a solid hour and a half of conversation. Come on, Chaz! However, I am sure deaf people don't just give a random person/ a person they just met a name sign, so I understand. But, if any deaf person wants to make me feel pretty darn important/happy/special/crazy excited, step right up and give me a name sign! (It would be greatly appreciated)
Chapter 23
When the deaf community/ deaf individuals question where you learn ASL and from who, is it considered gossiping? I 100% don't think that this should be considered gossiping, and if it is, then I feel like it is a positive form of gossiping. Before signing up for classes at WKU I did some "research" through some older friends who had already taken general education courses there. I asked them which courses to take, the ones I would learn the most, and what professors they preferred. This was all to benefit me, not to gossip and chit chat about professors or to put anyone down. I don't recall any negative comments being made about certain courses, only positive opinions being shared about the "good" courses. Negative "chit-chat" is what I consider gossiping. I don't think this is the intention of Deaf people. I believe that when they become very interested in your ASL background they are simply doing it for your benefit and for the growth of their language. I feel as if they want ASL students to get the best possible education, after all, it is not common to meet an individual devoted to studying ASL. By expressing their concerns or praises of different instructors they are guiding you on the path of success.
Although I don't know much about ESL programs, if I were to meet a foreigner who spoke some English, I would be very curious as to where they learned it. Furthermore I would like to guide them in the right direction to better their understanding and progress of the language. I feel like this is how it is between most Deaf people/ sign language students. I am sure it is unrealistic to assume that all deaf individuals would be so welcoming and helpful, however I feel that if the majority of the deaf community would be a little less harsh (simply going by the tone I am getting from the book), students would be more eager to further pursue ASL, thus resulting in a larger number of high qualified educators and an increasing rate of ASL programs.
Chapter 24
Respond to the following statement: “Deaf citizens rightfully resent hearing people’s learning ASL so they can take Deaf peoples jobs away while increasing their own power in the Deaf Community.”
In my last post I discussed the desire deaf individuals have for the success of ASL students. While, I don't believe it is EVERY SINGLE deaf person's desire, I am a little peeved by this quote. I think that this is a strong generalization. A person having no exposure or knowledge of the deaf community, besides reading this book, could have a somewhat disturbing idea of the deaf created by this quote. I feel as if this book continuously reiterates the fact that "Hearing people" take no interest in the deaf community and have little respect for their culture. So, this puzzles me. Do they WANT us to learn ASL in order to create a community in which they feel apart of or do they NOT want us to learn it so we won't take away their jobs? All Hearing people aren't evil as this book sometimes depicts, and I don't believe it is the goal of ASL students to take away jobs that the Deaf rightfully deserve or to gain power in the Deaf community. Personally, I am taking ASL in order to serve deaf individuals that I might encounter along my career path as an audiologist. When a deaf child comes to me for hearing tests, screenings, in search of a cochlear implant, or hearing aid I would like to be able to make their day by communicating with them in a language that is familiar to THEM. I don't want to take away a job position that I feel like a Deaf individual is better suited for simply because I know ASL. I feel like this is my first frustrated reaction towards this book. I have remained open-minded and mostly agreed with the arguments presented, but I have mixed emotions towards this argument. I don't feel as if deaf people should "rightfully resent" us until they understand our goals and know us on a personal level. STOP stereotyping "Hearing people." Many of us respect the "purity" and who is to say interpreters are only trying to "make money off Deaf people's language" ?? Geez!!
I know it is considered very impolite to stare, but it has always been extremely difficult not to stare when there are odd situations in public (well for me atleast). Growing up, and even today, it is easy for me to be enticed by ASL users in public. I often stare and wonder what in the world they are saying. It is kind of like at the nail salon- girls, you know what I'm talking about- the Asian ladies are constantly jibber jabbering in their (whatever) language and just full of laughter. It's hard for me to just ignore it besides they COULD be talking about me, right? But, my mom gets so frustrated and goes on and on about how I just "rudely eye-balled" them my entire appointment. Anyways, I am glad this chapter cleared some things up for me, such as "There is no such thing as a private ASL conversation in public." Now, I don't feel so bad. Also, now that I have some basic ASL instruction, it is good to know that it isn't necessarily bad manners to enter a conversation (at the appropriate time). I've always wanted to be apart of it instead of a simple onlooker staring in complete awe! This brings me to my next point... my biggest, and yes corny, wish! I want a name sign SO bad! I totally thought that this one deaf guy I met at a DCE a few weeks ago would give me one after a solid hour and a half of conversation. Come on, Chaz! However, I am sure deaf people don't just give a random person/ a person they just met a name sign, so I understand. But, if any deaf person wants to make me feel pretty darn important/happy/special/crazy excited, step right up and give me a name sign! (It would be greatly appreciated)
Chapter 23
When the deaf community/ deaf individuals question where you learn ASL and from who, is it considered gossiping? I 100% don't think that this should be considered gossiping, and if it is, then I feel like it is a positive form of gossiping. Before signing up for classes at WKU I did some "research" through some older friends who had already taken general education courses there. I asked them which courses to take, the ones I would learn the most, and what professors they preferred. This was all to benefit me, not to gossip and chit chat about professors or to put anyone down. I don't recall any negative comments being made about certain courses, only positive opinions being shared about the "good" courses. Negative "chit-chat" is what I consider gossiping. I don't think this is the intention of Deaf people. I believe that when they become very interested in your ASL background they are simply doing it for your benefit and for the growth of their language. I feel as if they want ASL students to get the best possible education, after all, it is not common to meet an individual devoted to studying ASL. By expressing their concerns or praises of different instructors they are guiding you on the path of success.
Although I don't know much about ESL programs, if I were to meet a foreigner who spoke some English, I would be very curious as to where they learned it. Furthermore I would like to guide them in the right direction to better their understanding and progress of the language. I feel like this is how it is between most Deaf people/ sign language students. I am sure it is unrealistic to assume that all deaf individuals would be so welcoming and helpful, however I feel that if the majority of the deaf community would be a little less harsh (simply going by the tone I am getting from the book), students would be more eager to further pursue ASL, thus resulting in a larger number of high qualified educators and an increasing rate of ASL programs.
Chapter 24
Respond to the following statement: “Deaf citizens rightfully resent hearing people’s learning ASL so they can take Deaf peoples jobs away while increasing their own power in the Deaf Community.”
In my last post I discussed the desire deaf individuals have for the success of ASL students. While, I don't believe it is EVERY SINGLE deaf person's desire, I am a little peeved by this quote. I think that this is a strong generalization. A person having no exposure or knowledge of the deaf community, besides reading this book, could have a somewhat disturbing idea of the deaf created by this quote. I feel as if this book continuously reiterates the fact that "Hearing people" take no interest in the deaf community and have little respect for their culture. So, this puzzles me. Do they WANT us to learn ASL in order to create a community in which they feel apart of or do they NOT want us to learn it so we won't take away their jobs? All Hearing people aren't evil as this book sometimes depicts, and I don't believe it is the goal of ASL students to take away jobs that the Deaf rightfully deserve or to gain power in the Deaf community. Personally, I am taking ASL in order to serve deaf individuals that I might encounter along my career path as an audiologist. When a deaf child comes to me for hearing tests, screenings, in search of a cochlear implant, or hearing aid I would like to be able to make their day by communicating with them in a language that is familiar to THEM. I don't want to take away a job position that I feel like a Deaf individual is better suited for simply because I know ASL. I feel like this is my first frustrated reaction towards this book. I have remained open-minded and mostly agreed with the arguments presented, but I have mixed emotions towards this argument. I don't feel as if deaf people should "rightfully resent" us until they understand our goals and know us on a personal level. STOP stereotyping "Hearing people." Many of us respect the "purity" and who is to say interpreters are only trying to "make money off Deaf people's language" ?? Geez!!
Saturday, October 27, 2012
Chapters 19-21
Chapter 19:
Total communication is defined by the CEASD as "a philosophy incorporating the appropriate aural, manual, and oral modes of communication in order to ensure effective communication with and among hearing-impaired persons." It is described as a right for deaf individuals to have access to a large variety of communication that is suitable for the specific person. Many people who use this term tend to confuse it with the combining of speech and sign language. This was an interesting topic because the chapter provided a history of how Total Communication was used as a combining mode in the earliest deaf education classes. But as time went on oralism became more popular and signing was banned from the classroom. Thankfully Edward Miner Gallaudet rescued ASL from being discriminated against forever. He worked to advocate the "combined approach" allowing ASL to be used in the classroom and oral courses still being offered. This reintroduced Total Communication as a philosophy that "deaf children had the right of access to any form of communication that they felt comfortable with and would benefit from."
I also learned about Simultaneous Communication in this chapter. This is a method of talking while signing. The book shares that Simultaneous Communication can often be confused wit Total Communication and I feel as if that is a fair statement. Although one is a philosophy and one a method, both involve oralism. "Bilingual-Bicultural" approach is also another topic this chapter covered. This approach uses "ASL-in-the-classroom to teach English." The authors clearly state that the "Bilingual-Bicultural" approach and the TC philosophy should not be confused with one another. The TC philosophy calls for diversity in the training needs of each individual deaf person, while the "Bi-Bi" approach strongly emphasizes the use of ASL in the classroom.
Overall. this chapter was rich with information. I had no previous knowledge of the topics covered in Chapter 19, and feel as if it was a reasonably understandable introduction to three distinct concepts unique to the Deaf Community. I hope as I continue on my ASL "journey" I will personally experience these approaches first hand in different settings to better understand them and develop my own viewpoints.
Chapter 20:
First and foremost let me just say how thankful I am that I attend a University that recognizes ASL as a foreign language. By enrolling in this course my eyes have truly been opened up to such an amazing group of people and I have learned so much in this short amount of time. I consider "CD 101" to be a wonderful blessing.
With that being said, yes I believe that all universities should offer and accept ASL as a foreign language requirement. I might be a little biased in saying this. I agree 110% with the argument presented in the chapter for support in ASL foreign language programs. America is a "melting pot," right? If colleges and universities are willing to offer languages such as Spanish, French, German, and even Navajo, shouldn't they recognize the language of such an enormous group here in our own country?! I have often been asked by my peers what foreign language I am taking. When I respond with "ASL" I get some puzzled looks..."You mean that's a foreign language?" Gosh, that aggravates me. People all around the world use Sign Language, so step up American universities and recognize the need for not only "foreign" communication but domestic as well.
I believe that ASL could have a written language, but does that mean it should? I don't feel as if ASL should HAVE to have a written language in order to get the respect/recognition it deserves. American Sign Language has endured many obstacles throughout history, but I don't think it should change in order to fit the "language requirements" set by hearing people. ASL works for deaf individuals, if there was a serious need for a written language in order for the deaf to improve or communicate I think it would have already been accepted and put to use. Similar to the written Navajo language, some native speakers understand it and some don't. That would be the same result for American Sign Language as a written language. That is even true with English speaking individuals; not all English speaking individuals understand English literature. The book states that "it is important to recognize that for a bilingual community the literature can be in two languages." I think ASL can be the physical language and English the written for the deaf. But, ultimately, I believe it is in the hands of the deaf individual or deaf community to decide.
Chapter 21:
I hate to say that this chapter kind of discouraged me. I guess I wanted to hear that deaf people are always eager for a hearing signer to try to communicate with them (even if they are just beginners). But, as I reflect on it, I completely understand their point of view. I am from a small town so growing up I was never in a situation where I was "up close and personal" to a deaf/deaf conversation. Now that I have moved to college I see it more often. Like Alis Coates, I feel somewhat intimidated or nervous seeing deaf people interact. I have such a strong desire to approach deaf people signing in public, but I wouldn't say I am 100% confident in my abilities yet. I also fear that I would be considered annoying, even though I would want constructive criticism, I don't think I could handle being completely rejected.
The Deaf Culture events are settings in which the deaf are eager to participate. At the most recent event one deaf guy (Sam) even acted as the teacher. He wasn't offended at all by our ASL abilities or lack-there-of. I feel comfortable communicating through ASL in those settings, but encountering a random conversation in a public place is a scary thought. I guess I can only hope for the best! :)
Wednesday, October 24, 2012
Chapters 16-18
Chapter 16:
I absolutely loathe the feeling of isolation. Therefore, I can only imagine the difficulty of being deaf in an area with no other deaf people. It only seems right that most deaf people would move to big cities with hopes of being surrounded with others like them. Even then it would be a big adjustment. First, the deaf individuals moving from the rural, isolated areas will not be as advanced in their language abilities. Without the formal education and ability to interact with other deaf people, it would be tough for them to be surrounded by a community who is more distinguished. Second, the different regional dialects will come into effect. From a personal experience, I have noticed that Stacey's signs are not always exactly the same as the ASL lab instructors. This is due to the fact that Stacey was born and raised in California where the signs vary from those who practice ASL in Kentucky. I think it is neat how different regions have unique signs, but like the book states this does present some "unavoidable confusion."
I really appreciate how the authors incorporated some advice concerning instructional resources. However, it is extremely sad that for a deaf individual to learn ASL they have to go through such a long and "iffy" process of finding reliable resources. Imagine having to go to numerous libraries or bookstores, or even purchase expensive equipment to simply learn how to communicate! Hearing individuals are just able to pick up our native language. Seldom do we have to refer to a book or multimedia program. So, I believe we shouldn't take our abilities for granted!
Chapter 17:
Before reading this chapter I had never heard of "pidgin." Interestingly enough, I found that Pidgin Sign English allows "native ASL signers and native English speakers to comfortably communicate with each other." (pg. 119) It seems like a more simple way for non-deaf to communicate since it is basically English word order with some English grammar omitted. Before taking the CD 101 course, I thought that sign language was signed in natural English order, so it was interesting to learn that sometimes it is in fact by using PSE.
Professor William Newell stated: " PSE is not truly a "pidgin" in the same sense that other pidgin languages exist in the world." This encouraged me to research other pidgin languages and I found that one of the most famous is Hawaiian Pidgin English.
- In the Hawaiian islands there were various languages on each island. These were brought about by merchants visiting and some staying on the islands. Merchants brought with them their own language making communication among the islands very difficult. The people finally derived their own language which was a mixture of languages from countries including America, Korea, China, the Philippines, Japan, and Samoa. This was known as Hawaiian Pidgin. It is still spoken by people in Hawaii (mainly teenagers) and is mostly versions of English slang.
- Some phrases include: "no can", "talk stink", and "wat doing?"
- Some vocabulary is:
- Choke- alot
- Slippa- sandals
- Tutu- grandmother
- Bruddahs- brothers
- An interesting fact I found was that bookstores in Hawaii actually sell books to help tourists understand Hawaiian Pidgin
I believe code switching is important because is it a way to break the language barrier that can sometimes be intimidating or difficult to learn. I feel as if it is a helpful aid to native English users who are just beginning to communicate through ASL. Even though it may be helpful, I don't feel as if deaf people should rely solely on "code switching" to communicate with hearing people. By doing this, "Hearing people rarely get to see pure ASL being used in their presence." (pg. 121) If true ASL is never used in our/hearing individuals presence how will we ever learn the complexity of the language.
Chapter 18:
I feel as if I wouldn't be completely in the middle of the "continuum." I would probably be slightly toward the left of Pidgin Sign English (closer to "pure English" users). I understand that I have not fully grasped the concept of ASL and I am not afraid to admit that I still have trouble remembering not to sign in English order. I am a beginner, but I am willing and eager to progressively move towards the right side of "the arc."
Some people may view initialized sign as "bad" because it is not PURE ASL. But what they do not realize is that some of the signs may carry "real meaning" instead of just representing Signed English. (If I am understanding this correctly. This chapter seemed somewhat confusing to me.)
Tuesday, October 23, 2012
Chapters 13- 15 & Quiz
Chapter 13:
I am going to take a different approach to this chapters discussion:
I think it is pretty safe to say that in today's society people place a great deal of emphasis on public figures who give back to Americans or to the people of their communities. We are quite aware of Michelle Obama's "Let's Move" campaign or Lance Armstrong's influence on cancer awareness. I notice groups such as cancer patients, obese individuals, minorities, or underprivileged children being targeted and put into the spot light of awareness. It really irritates me that the deaf culture never receives the recognition that these groups do. I mean, come on, there are numerous campaigns for the importance of spaying and neutering your pets, but nationally and locally the deaf culture is somewhat put into a dark closet. Honestly, I was never aware of the depth of this culture until I began reading this book. This is why Chapter 13 appeals to me so much. It is pretty interesting to me that President Jimmy Carter acknowledged the deaf community on his Inauguration Day walk by flashing the ILY sign. Am I saying that this was just a perfect thing to do to acknowledge them? No! I think that the deaf community deserves way more recognition wherever they go and whenever they go. But, I feel as if Carter did more than anyone else had ever done and even more than what public figures are doing now to communicate to them that they are seen and that they are important. Like I said earlier it is obvious that we place emphasis on public figures and of course after Carter used the "ILY" sign it seemed universally acceptable and appropriate. "The Smiley Face of Deaf Culture."
However that was years ago. Now, flashing the ILY sign to a group of deaf individuals usually gets you nowhere. Quite frankly, I agree with the deaf community that this sign is overused and annoying. If you REALLY care about communicating with them and breaking that language barrier at least have the decency to learn a few more signs. It's pretty easy to use commercialized language.
Chapter 14:
Fingerspelling is definitely a concept that I am still trying to grasp. I can make all of the letters and understand what another signer spells, but I am no master. I can definitely relate to Roger Mindel's concerns and this chapter eased my worries! Like the book suggests I have practiced finger spelling in the mirror, run through the "ABC's" a few times a day, and often spell words I see on posters or ads. I guess it should be kind of understood that improving manual dexterity would absolutely help! Of course, I never thought of that. Soooo...I took their advice to heart and bought a "medium hard rubber ball." I don't think it's working yet, but I haven't "exercised" with it enough to see a difference. Ha! I'm not all that into anything involving the word "exercise."
Anyways a personal fun fact: 3 weekends ago I taught my dad the "ABC's" and he loved it! He printed off a chart so he could practice and now every time I go home he and I sign random words to each other! It's really fun! He likes to watch my Signing Naturally videos too...weird! I think it is extremely important to practice this technique frequently and I am thankful I have established the confidence to actually finger spell outside of class with my family and even my peers!
I can't wait until I am good enough for my hands to actually become a "new voice" but I do still have that general awkwardness.I feel like my classmates and I are mostly at the same stage of awkwardness where no one is confident enough to correct the others or point out large mistakes. Once we are all able to feel confident enough to give GOOD feedback to one another I feel as if we will all progress.
Chapter 15:
I absolutely agree that all children should learn how to sign! The main points the book gave that I strongly support are:
I am going to take a different approach to this chapters discussion:
I think it is pretty safe to say that in today's society people place a great deal of emphasis on public figures who give back to Americans or to the people of their communities. We are quite aware of Michelle Obama's "Let's Move" campaign or Lance Armstrong's influence on cancer awareness. I notice groups such as cancer patients, obese individuals, minorities, or underprivileged children being targeted and put into the spot light of awareness. It really irritates me that the deaf culture never receives the recognition that these groups do. I mean, come on, there are numerous campaigns for the importance of spaying and neutering your pets, but nationally and locally the deaf culture is somewhat put into a dark closet. Honestly, I was never aware of the depth of this culture until I began reading this book. This is why Chapter 13 appeals to me so much. It is pretty interesting to me that President Jimmy Carter acknowledged the deaf community on his Inauguration Day walk by flashing the ILY sign. Am I saying that this was just a perfect thing to do to acknowledge them? No! I think that the deaf community deserves way more recognition wherever they go and whenever they go. But, I feel as if Carter did more than anyone else had ever done and even more than what public figures are doing now to communicate to them that they are seen and that they are important. Like I said earlier it is obvious that we place emphasis on public figures and of course after Carter used the "ILY" sign it seemed universally acceptable and appropriate. "The Smiley Face of Deaf Culture."
However that was years ago. Now, flashing the ILY sign to a group of deaf individuals usually gets you nowhere. Quite frankly, I agree with the deaf community that this sign is overused and annoying. If you REALLY care about communicating with them and breaking that language barrier at least have the decency to learn a few more signs. It's pretty easy to use commercialized language.
Chapter 14:
Fingerspelling is definitely a concept that I am still trying to grasp. I can make all of the letters and understand what another signer spells, but I am no master. I can definitely relate to Roger Mindel's concerns and this chapter eased my worries! Like the book suggests I have practiced finger spelling in the mirror, run through the "ABC's" a few times a day, and often spell words I see on posters or ads. I guess it should be kind of understood that improving manual dexterity would absolutely help! Of course, I never thought of that. Soooo...I took their advice to heart and bought a "medium hard rubber ball." I don't think it's working yet, but I haven't "exercised" with it enough to see a difference. Ha! I'm not all that into anything involving the word "exercise."
Anyways a personal fun fact: 3 weekends ago I taught my dad the "ABC's" and he loved it! He printed off a chart so he could practice and now every time I go home he and I sign random words to each other! It's really fun! He likes to watch my Signing Naturally videos too...weird! I think it is extremely important to practice this technique frequently and I am thankful I have established the confidence to actually finger spell outside of class with my family and even my peers!
I can't wait until I am good enough for my hands to actually become a "new voice" but I do still have that general awkwardness.I feel like my classmates and I are mostly at the same stage of awkwardness where no one is confident enough to correct the others or point out large mistakes. Once we are all able to feel confident enough to give GOOD feedback to one another I feel as if we will all progress.
Chapter 15:
I absolutely agree that all children should learn how to sign! The main points the book gave that I strongly support are:
- It is a useful survival skill for anyone
- You never know when someone in your family could become deaf (or you may have a deaf child in the future)
- A working knowledge of fingerspelling allows hearing people to communicate with deaf people
- Lastly because it is FUN!
I did some further research on the opinion of the question "Should all children learn how to sign?" and found an article that adds some other interesting views in support of the topic.
Here is the link, feel free to check it out: http://www.cchs.org/blog/top-10-reasons-all-children-should-know-sign-language/
I wish my parents would have been aware of all of the positive effects learning ASL can have!
Quiz Reflection:
Let me just boast...I made a 100% on the quiz! Haha! I think it is just due to the simple fact that I am so interested in the information that this book offers. I encode information well when I am interested in the content and not bored to tears. This class along with this book really does something for me! It makes me feel productive, useful, and important. I want to use this information to help better the daily lives of deaf people and immerse myself in this unique culture!
*If only I could get a 100% on all of the receptive tests in class...hmmm!
Chapters 11-12
Chapter 11:
Well, I learned something new! I never considered that sign language was characterized by gender, but it makes total sense. I found it interesting that the female signs reflect the tying of bonnet strings while the masculine signs reflect the gesture of tipping a hat. Pretty cool. However, geez, I am a little offended. You mean to tell me that signs such as "gossipy" are likewise made in the feminine zone. Who ever would have guessed? Ha! Oh, but males get the "intelligent" sign in THEIR zone? I don't think I agree with that. Can we go back a few decades and fix this, please?
I completely understand that there are signs that could be considered "racist." That exists in any culture or language (referring to slang terms). Although I understand this concept, I don't support the use of it as an insult-especially the example they gave in the book for a sign corresponding to "nigger." I can also understand how the original "Oriental" signs could come "under fire as being patronizing and inaccurate." Point out a specific group by their physical features, and there's sure to be controversy. I am sure that the "Oriental" individuals would prefer the new signs to represent their people, but I don't feel as if the original signs were meant in any degrading form, just a simple way to distinguish people.
I think it is important for things to grow and change to fit modern times/needs. Change is inevitable, and I think it is important that ASL continues to change to fit each culture whether it be British, French, Japanese, Chinese, etc. Old signs can't forever be used and won't always be appropriate. Today, people don't go around saying "clodhopper" or other strange words to refer to people. No, we just call you a Redneck. My point is, language is something that evolves...always has, always will.
Chapter 12:
Remember those little book order packets they used to send home in grade school? Yeah, the packets that my mother usually threw away to avoid spending crazy amounts of money on books that would more than likely just collect dust. On one specific occasion however, she fell for those precious pouty eyes. Sucker! I was looking through the advertisements when I stumbled upon a book that caught my eye. It was a beginners sign language book and I HAD TO HAVE IT! When I explained to mom that it would just be "the coolest thing ever" if I could learn a different language and teach it to all my friends at school she totally fell for it. Boy was I excited when my $12.99 introductory ASL book arrived in the mail! I carried it around and read it over and over again. I learned simple things such as "hello" and some different animals, nothing too major. That was my first introduction to sign language! I forgot about it for a few years until I had an epiphany that my career would be dedicated to helping individuals with communication disorders.
Now, I have used sources such as Signing Naturally, www.aslopro.com, and www.signingsavvy.com to guide me along!
As far as signing space is concerned. I feel quite comfortable. Never do I feel as if my signs are too big, but sometimes I understand that they are too small.
Well, I learned something new! I never considered that sign language was characterized by gender, but it makes total sense. I found it interesting that the female signs reflect the tying of bonnet strings while the masculine signs reflect the gesture of tipping a hat. Pretty cool. However, geez, I am a little offended. You mean to tell me that signs such as "gossipy" are likewise made in the feminine zone. Who ever would have guessed? Ha! Oh, but males get the "intelligent" sign in THEIR zone? I don't think I agree with that. Can we go back a few decades and fix this, please?
I completely understand that there are signs that could be considered "racist." That exists in any culture or language (referring to slang terms). Although I understand this concept, I don't support the use of it as an insult-especially the example they gave in the book for a sign corresponding to "nigger." I can also understand how the original "Oriental" signs could come "under fire as being patronizing and inaccurate." Point out a specific group by their physical features, and there's sure to be controversy. I am sure that the "Oriental" individuals would prefer the new signs to represent their people, but I don't feel as if the original signs were meant in any degrading form, just a simple way to distinguish people.
I think it is important for things to grow and change to fit modern times/needs. Change is inevitable, and I think it is important that ASL continues to change to fit each culture whether it be British, French, Japanese, Chinese, etc. Old signs can't forever be used and won't always be appropriate. Today, people don't go around saying "clodhopper" or other strange words to refer to people. No, we just call you a Redneck. My point is, language is something that evolves...always has, always will.
Chapter 12:
Remember those little book order packets they used to send home in grade school? Yeah, the packets that my mother usually threw away to avoid spending crazy amounts of money on books that would more than likely just collect dust. On one specific occasion however, she fell for those precious pouty eyes. Sucker! I was looking through the advertisements when I stumbled upon a book that caught my eye. It was a beginners sign language book and I HAD TO HAVE IT! When I explained to mom that it would just be "the coolest thing ever" if I could learn a different language and teach it to all my friends at school she totally fell for it. Boy was I excited when my $12.99 introductory ASL book arrived in the mail! I carried it around and read it over and over again. I learned simple things such as "hello" and some different animals, nothing too major. That was my first introduction to sign language! I forgot about it for a few years until I had an epiphany that my career would be dedicated to helping individuals with communication disorders.
Now, I have used sources such as Signing Naturally, www.aslopro.com, and www.signingsavvy.com to guide me along!
As far as signing space is concerned. I feel quite comfortable. Never do I feel as if my signs are too big, but sometimes I understand that they are too small.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)